SR postcode area: Sunderland
The SR postcode area is known as the Sunderland area. It is every postcode that begins SR followed by a number. It has 9 districts and 6,881 postcodes in use, across 3 councils.
Homes in the SR area sold for a typical £140,000 in the 12 months to August 2026. By district, that runs from £62,275 in SR1 (Sunderland) to £202,000 in SR6 (Sunderland).
For the town itself, see Sunderland postcodes.
Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS) Postcode Directory, August 2026, loaded 20 October 2026. The name is the one the area is commonly known by; it is not part of the ONS data. See all our data sources
Where it is
Latitude 54.8739
Longitude -1.3893
This is the middle of the postcodes in the SR area. An area can be many miles across, and we do not draw its boundary.
Open this area on OpenStreetMapSource: Office for National Statistics (ONS) Postcode Directory, August 2026, loaded 20 October 2026. How we use it
What do homes cost in the SR area?
Homes in the SR area sold for a typical £140,000 in the 12 months to August 2026, across 2,260 sales, down 5.6% on the 12 months before, HM Land Registry's figures show.
- 12 months to August 2025
- £148,250
- 12 months to August 2026
- £140,000
▼ down 5.6% on the 12 months before
Standard sales of homes at market value at the area's postcodes. A typical price is the median, the middle sale. Each district below has its own, and each postcode page the figure for its sector.
Source: HM Land Registry Price Paid Data, files dated 28 September 2026. Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2021. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. How we use it
How do the SR districts compare?
A district is the first half of a postcode. Each row gives its typical home price, how many of its postcodes can get gigabit broadband for every home, and how many have a home at flood risk. Each opens the district.
- SR1 postcode district: SunderlandSunderland 291 postcodes Typical price£62,275 Gigabit, every home113 of 280 At flood risk4 of 291
- SR2 postcode district: SunderlandSunderland 869 postcodes Typical price£155,000 Gigabit, every home753 of 845 At flood risk17 of 869
- SR3 postcode district: SunderlandSunderland 932 postcodes Typical price£170,000 Gigabit, every home792 of 919 At flood risk16 of 932
- SR4 postcode district: SunderlandSunderland 956 postcodes Typical price£135,000 Gigabit, every home776 of 952 At flood risk4 of 956
- SR5 postcode district: SunderlandSunderland, South Tyneside 1,050 postcodes Typical price£128,500 Gigabit, every home876 of 946 At flood risk2 of 1,050
- SR6 postcode district: SunderlandSunderland, South Tyneside 736 postcodes Typical price£202,000 Gigabit, every home622 of 731 At flood risk15 of 736
- SR7 postcode district: SeahamCounty Durham, Sunderland 872 postcodes Typical price£129,500 Gigabit, every home708 of 849 At flood risk8 of 872
- SR8 postcode district: PeterleeCounty Durham 978 postcodes Typical price£90,000 Gigabit, every home794 of 966 At flood risk2 of 978
- SR43 postcode district: No place listedNo council given 197 postcodes Typical priceToo few sales At flood riskNone listed
Prices: HM Land Registry, files dated 28 September 2026; the bar is set against the dearest district. Gigabit: Ofcom, Connected Nations, Spring 2026, counting postcodes. Flood: Environment Agency, published 6 July 2026, postcodes in England with a home or business in an area at risk from rivers or the sea. How we use them
One row for every district in the area. "No place listed" means no town or village is large enough to list for it.
Places in the SR area
Towns and villages with postcodes in the SR area, each with the typical price of a home there where at least 5 sold.
Councils in the SR area
How many of the area's postcodes fall under each council.
- Sunderland4,584 postcodes
- County Durham1,847 postcodes
- South Tyneside253 postcodes
Near the SR area
The postcode areas whose centre points are nearest to this one's, nearest first.
Check a postcode
Something wrong on this page? Report an error and we will check it against the source.